Anyone else interested in Cloverfield?
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:50 -0700
At first, I was only mildly interested in this movie, but I've become intrigued after hearing some early reactions:
http://daily.greencine.com/archives/005249.html
"It's amazing in that it's so short (by my watch about 74 minutes without credits), and yet so fierce," writes Jeffrey Wells. "This movie is REM madness. It is Guillermo del Toro on a tab of brown acid with a little crack thrown in."
If I were in charge of marketing for this movie, I think that's the quote I would put on the poster. I was a little surprised to hear that it's so short, which I don't think is necessarily a bad thing, but IMO, anything that's only about 74 minutes sans end credits should really be part of a double bill with something else.
http://daily.greencine.com/archives/005249.html
"It's amazing in that it's so short (by my watch about 74 minutes without credits), and yet so fierce," writes Jeffrey Wells. "This movie is REM madness. It is Guillermo del Toro on a tab of brown acid with a little crack thrown in."
If I were in charge of marketing for this movie, I think that's the quote I would put on the poster. I was a little surprised to hear that it's so short, which I don't think is necessarily a bad thing, but IMO, anything that's only about 74 minutes sans end credits should really be part of a double bill with something else.